الجمعة، 11 مايو 2012

Incidence of Gall Stones in women in south Libya عامر التواتي


Incidence of Gall Stones in women in south Libya

Mahmoud H. Milad  Amer Eitwati,* Khalifa M. Alayat,** Muhrez M. Ibrahim,**,**
Abdulqader M. Sufrani,*** Soad M. Hussein,****


Introduction:

Gall stones (G.S) disease is world wide a major cause of abdominal morbidity leading to hospital admission in populations.
It is more common among adults,4 risk factors are multiple and may differ from one geographic area to another. For that, many papers are issued studying different risk factors of gall stones.1-3 It is estimated that 10-20% of the adult populations in developed countries have gall stones6 , with a higher prevalence in women.7 Many reports indicate that acute cholecystitis is more common in diabetic patients.8-9

Method and Material:
The presence of gall bladder stones diagnosed by ultrasound in a random group of women, prospectively studied and analyzed for age, parity, family history, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, breast feeding and contraceptive pills.
All patients examined were females above 15years consulting outpatient ultrasound clinic for gyenobstetric clinic follow up or antenatal care patients presenting with pain at RHC or those who have had cholecystectomy were also included.
Ultrasound was performed at radiology department, 2nd March teaching hospital. The ultrasound device used in the study was ALOKA SDD 4000 color Doppler; the probe used was 3.5MHz multi-frequency (from 2.5 up to 6MHz).
Diagnosis of gall stones was done by noticing a stone or the presence of acoustic shadow for small stones.

Results:

A total of 1130 women have been examined, 167 women were found to have gall stones or previous cholecystectomy performed for gall stones (14.77%).
Age ranged from 16-70 yrs, with a mean 38yrs. 84 patients have family history of gall stones (50.2%). Parity range (0-16) births with a mean parity (4.74), 21 women are either single or nullipara (12.5%).17 women are diabetic (10.17%) and 25 are hypertensive (14.9%), 134 are breast feeding (80.3%), and only 10 cases gave a history of contraceptive pill use (5.98%) Table No 1.


Table 1: Comparison between patients and control groups.


Mean
age
Family h/o
G.S
Mean parity
Diabetes
Hypertension
Breast
Feeding
Contraceptive Pill taking

No
%

No
%
No
%
No
%
No
%
Patients
38
84
50.2
4.74
17
10.7
25
14.9
134
80.3
10
5.98%
Control
31.6
22
13
2.4
5
2.99
10
5.98
73
43.7
3
1.79%


33 cases have pain at RHC or history of pain (19.76%) and 69 cases have had previous cholecystectomy (41.32) making a total of 102 cases considered as symptomatic (61%), 65 cases are asymptomatic (39%) Table No. 2.

Table 2: Symptomatic and asymptomatic gall bladder (GB) patients.
GB patients
No
%
Symptomatic
102
61%
Asymptomatic
65
39%
Total
167
100%



*) Department of radiology, 2nd March teaching hospital, Sebha, Libya.
**) Department of surgery, 2nd March teaching hospital, Sebha, Libya.
***) Department of medicine, 2nd March teaching hospital, Sebha, Libya.
****) Department of gyn-obs, 2nd March teaching hospital, Sebha, Libya.


Out of the 963examined women without gall stones, 167 cases were randomly selected as a control group compared with 167 cases with gall stones for the risk factors in question. Table No. 1 compares GB stones with a control group for different risk factors.

Table No 3.
Age group
No. of cases
15-24
15
25-34
63
35-44
48
45-54
23
55-64
12
≥65
3

Discussion:-
In our study, the maximum incidence of gall stones was in the age group (25-34yrs), 63 patients (37.7%) while Kratzer et al1 showed highest incidence in the age group (51-65) (13.7%). Borch et al2 in a Swedish study of gall stones prevalence showed a maximum incidence at older age groups >75 yrs (53%) had gall stones.
84 patients (50.2%) have had family history of gall stones compared to (11.5%) by Kratzer et al.1
87.5% of women with gall stones have child birth with a mean parity 4.7, while 12.5% are nullipara.
Pannwitz et al3 in a German study showed 23% of multipara women had gall stones and only 3.1% of nullipara had gall stones.
The overall incidence of G.S disease in women is 14.77% in our study, while Kratzer et al1 in a German study found that 33.8% of women had G.S.
In our study, only 10 patients of G.S had a history of contraceptive pills taking (5.98%), while Pannwitz et al3 in a German study showed that the incidence of GS in patients taking contraceptive pills icreases with age 5.9% in 24yrs, 20% in 25-44yrs age group and 30% in 45-54yrs age group.
10.17% of GS patients are diabetic while Torben5 in a Danish study found 23.8% of diabetics have sail stones.


Table No 4: Comparison of results


Khalifa & Mahmoud
Kratzer
Pannwitz
Torben

Borch

Mean age
37.7
33.8
&&&&&
&&&&&
&&&&&
Incidence of GS
14.77
13.7
&&&&&
&&&&&
&&&&&
Family history
50.2
11.5
&&&&&
&&&&&
&&&&&
Contraceptive
5.98
&&&&&
30%
&&&&&
&&&&&
D.M
10.17
&&&&&
&&&&&
23.8
&&&&&
Parity
&&&&&
&&&&&
&&&&&
&&&&&
&&&&&
Maximum age
incidence
25-35yrs
51-65yrs
&&&&&
&&&&&
≥75




References:

1. Krazter W, Kachele V, et al. Gall stone prevalence in Germany. Volume 43;6. 1998, 1285-1291.
2. Borch k, Janson K.A, et al. Prevalence of gall stone disease in a Swedish population .Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. 1998; 23(11):1219-1225.
3. Pannwitz H, Berndt H, and Nurnberg D. Prevalence of cholelithiasis in relation to use of hormonal contraceptive. Gastroen-terology journal. 1990; 50(2): 78-81.
4. Beckingham LJ. ABC of gall stone disease. BMJ, 2001; 322:91-94.
5. Torben Jorgensen. Gall stone in a Danish population. G U T, 1989; Vol. 30(4):528-534.
6. Rome group for the epidemiology and prevention of cholelithiasis (GREPCO). Prevalence of gall stone in adult female population. Amj epidemiology, 1984; 119: 796-805.
7. Bateson Me, Bouchier IAD. Prevalence of gall bladder disease in Dundee a necropsy study. Br Med J, 1975:4:427-430.
8. Sandler RS, Maule WF, Baltus ME. Factors associated with postoperative complication in diabetics after biliary tract surgery.
9. Ransohff DF, Miller Gl, Hermann RE. Outcome of acute cholecystitis in patients with diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med, 1987; 106:829-32



ليست هناك تعليقات:

إرسال تعليق